Cases 11 - 20 of 56
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MILLER v. WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2019cv03074
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JOSPEH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. KASUL
as 1:2019cv01429
Defendant:
BRYAN KASUL
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONER v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Defendant:
J. LEON HOLMES, JERRY W. CAVANEAU, BETH DEER and others
Plaintiff:
TERRICK NOONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, II and CHARLES MOTTON, III
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC WOOTEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODERTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01646
Defendant:
CINDY EPLEY, CHANDLER, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI WOODERTS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv01484
Plaintiff:
JULIUS WAYNE MILLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv00293
Petitioner:
JULIUS D. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01685
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
