Cases 11 - 20 of 87
HALL v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03184
Plaintiff:
Orlando Cordia Hall
Defendant:
BARB VON BLANCKENSEE, T.J. WATSON, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LECROY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv02481
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, RADM CHRIS A. BINA, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LECROY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
WASHINGTON v. USA
as 1:2020cv01682
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
THOMAS M. WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VIALVA v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM P. BARR, WILLIAM E. WILSON, M.D., NICOLE C. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANDRE VIALVA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WASHINGTON v. USA
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DWONNE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PETERSON v. FOSTER GARVEY P.C.
as 1:2019cv03662
Defendant:
ASHLEY BALCERZAK, KASELEHLIE PRESS, WILLIAM JAYNES and others
Plaintiff:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2019cv03074
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and WASHINGTON DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JOSPEH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02381
Respondent:
WASHINGTON, D.C., STATE OF WASHINGTON and U.S.A.
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
