Cases 61 - 70 of 954
USA v. Randy Koontz
as 23-3014
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Randy Koontz
USA v. Rong Nie
as 23-3013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rong Nie
Stephen Edwards v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
as 23-5010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen S. Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
The Charles Schwab Corporation and United States of America
SANTAY-ROSALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv03662
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANTAY-ROSALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PADILLA v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv03444
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL PADILLA
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv03337
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE MARTWAIN HILL-EL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Franklin v. United States of America, Inc., et al
as 22-5248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua D. Franklin, also known as Josh
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Inc., Food & Drug Administration, State of Florida and others
WAYS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02843
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVIE M. KNIGHT and JOSE CUEVAS, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Carl Cooper
as 22-3051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Cooper
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D. FRANKLIN and JOSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
