Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MAYS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv03510
Defendant:
MISCHO, HALL, TARRA C. MUNNINGLY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. GREAT BRITAIN et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Respondent:
NICARAGUA, TERESA MAY, GREAT BRITAIN and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RENNER, DIANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
THOMAS K. JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIANE MAY, DAVID RENAER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv02216
Petitioner:
DERRICK O. MAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
