Cases 1 - 10 of 22
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03145
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURTS OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Leach v. DC, et al
as 22-7062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Leach
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, John Bewley, Officer; in his individual capacity, Christina Laury, Officer; in her individual capacity and others
RIVERA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RIVERA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLIER v. BURNES et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant:
DANIEL T. FLOYD, BALDEN D. POLK, DANNY OLIPHANT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRON LASHAWN COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
CARDENAS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv03408
Defendant:
JODY LEE, ANGEL CASTRO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO CESAR CARDENAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDONA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv01783
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO ANGEL CARDONA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SMITH v. JAIRAM et al
as 1:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
JAIRAM and ANGEL KEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAS et al
as 1:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
JAIRAM DAS and ANGEL KEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ANGEL ESPINOZA-LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILLIAMS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES
as 1:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
RANDEE DAMAR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
