Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Mark Carter v. BOP
as 24-5082
Plaintiff:
Mark Carter
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022cv02801
Plaintiff:
MARK CARTER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FENNER v. CARTER
as 1:2021cv01335
Respondent:
C. CARTER
Petitioner:
ANTWARN D. FENNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAHRAMPOUR v. UNITED STATES SENATORS et al
as 1:2020cv00800
Defendant:
JIMMY CARTER, UNITED STATES SENATORS, UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. WESTERN UNION CO. et al
as 1:2020cv00727
Defendant:
SUSAN CARTER, THE WESTERN UNION CO. and WESTERN UNION CO.
Plaintiff:
ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. FOSTER GARVEY P.C.
as 1:2019cv03662
Defendant:
ASHLEY BALCERZAK, KASELEHLIE PRESS, WILLIAM JAYNES and others
Plaintiff:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNOWLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00850
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT W. KNOWLES
Defendant:
SUSAN CARTER, ERIN COX, PAUL JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER-EL v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2017cv02482
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. CARTER-EL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER JR. v. BACIGALUPO et al
as 1:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DEON TURNER JR.
Defendant:
PAUL A. BACIGALUPO, KAMALA D. HARRIS, GERALD A. ENGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
