Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORN v. KYLE et al
as 1:2015cv01707
Plaintiff:
SEAN M. HORN
Defendant:
KYLE, AKOUKO, KEIFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Jones v. Steve Kirchner, et al
as 15-5088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Kirchner, D.C. MPD Detective, Joseph Sopata, D.C. MPD Detective, Stephen Naugle, F.B.I. Agent and others
Antoine Jones v. Steve Kirchner, et al
as 14-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Kirchner, D.C. MPD Detective, Joseph Sopata, D.C. MPD Detective, Stephen Naugle, F.B.I. Agent and others
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv01219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT, CRAIG APKER, RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LIEBER et al
as 1:2010cv00768
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
RACHEL LIEBER, JOHN GEISE, STEPHANIE YANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Jones v. Norma Horne, et al
as 09-5338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Norma Horne, Detective, Kelli Obrien, S.A., Maria Delaney, A.B.R.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
