Cases 1 - 10 of 136
HARRIS SR. v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
STEVEN JERMAINE HARRIS SR.
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINTERHALTER v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
FRANKIE DEAN WINTERHALTER
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STATE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROOKS v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv02839
Petitioner:
TERRELL BROOKS
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMES v. B.O.P et al.
as 1:2022cv02806
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JAMES
Defendant:
B.O.P., US ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
