Cases 91 - 100 of 115
Coalition for Responsible Reg v. EPA
as 09-1322
Intervenor:
Michigan Manufacturers Association, Glass Packaging Institute, State of Utah and others
Petitioner:
Great Northern Project Development, L.P., Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Rosebud Mining Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Nicola Scafetta, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, James P. Wallace, III and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Robert Powers v. DOJ, et al
as 09-5366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert W. Powers
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and State of Minnesota
Chamber of Commerce of the US, et al v. EPA
as 09-1237
Petitioner:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Automobile Dealers Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Environment California and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Pacific Legal Foundation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Sempra Energy, Charles E. Frank and others
Michael Newdow, et al v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 09-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Arthur Newdow, Ellery Schempp, Mel Lipman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Presidential Inaugural Committee, PIC, Emmett Beliveau, Executive Director, PIC and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of Texas, American Center for Law and Justice, State of Alabama and others
POWERS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. POWERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01878
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
State of New York v. EPA
as 08-1179
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
John Campbell, United States Representative
In re: Lorazepam
as 08-5045
In Re:
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Florida, By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth, State of Illinois, By Attorney General James E. Ryan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
In re: Lorazepam
as 08-5044
In Re:
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Florida, By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth, State of Illinois, By Attorney General James E. Ryan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
