Cases 91 - 97 of 97
STATE NATIONAL BANK OF BIG SPRING et al v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01032
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, THOMAS M. HOENIG, ELIZABETH DUKE and others
Petitioner:
VICTOR WILLIAMS and SEAN P. DUFFY
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
CONSUMERS' RESEARCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF WASHINGTON et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv00815
Plaintiff:
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF WASHINGTON , CONSORTIUM OF CATHOLIC ACADEMIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON, INC. , ARCHBISHOP CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DAVIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM DAVIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SEARCY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00860
Plaintiff:
EDGAR SEARCY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2007cv01035
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
IVEY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
STEVEN IVEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
