Cases 101 - 110 of 443
Robert Johnson v. Progressive Max Insurance Com, et al
as 20-7015
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter B. Lewis Estate, Pacific Motor Club, Jacobs Field, (Cleveland, OH) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Robert Johnson v. Keybank Capital Corporation, et al
as 20-5036
Defendant / Appellee:
Key Consumer Qspe LLC, Bay View Securization Corporation, First Niagara Realty, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
SHAIVITE TEMPLE v. 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES et al
as 1:2020cv00476
Defendant:
GORDON P. GALLAGHER, US COURTS, 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SASHA-SHAI VAN KUSH and SHAIVITE TEMPLE FEIN #37-1949939
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
OXENBERG et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TOWNSEND, CARLOS CUBILLAS, LAVONDA RAWLS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03763
Plaintiff:
ELLA LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03611
Defendant:
ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS, KATHLEEN M. HAWK SAWYER, JEFFREY A ROSEN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
JOHNSON v. KEYBANK CAPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03460
Defendant:
CORPORATE PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC, KEY RECREATION LENDING, POST OFFICE SQUARE FUNDING INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PROGRESSIVE MAX INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv03468
Defendant:
CLEVELAND INDIANS, ARX HOLDING CORPORATION, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE AGENCY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
