Cases 111 - 120 of 249
AZIZ v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
TARIQ AZIZ
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE W. BUSH, ERIC HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
FAY v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv00650
Petitioner:
LEIGHTON FAY
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZHAO v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
CHUN-YU ZHAO
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JAMES COLE, JULIE HILARIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CALDWELL v. KAGAN et al
as 1:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
ELENA KAGAN, ERIC HOLDER, DOUGLAS HOWARD GINSBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CANTU et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
DAVID CANTU , GUADALUPE GARCIA , NOE OBREGON and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIREARMS IMPORT/EXPORT ROUNDTABLE TRADE GROUP et al v. MELSON et al
as 1:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
FIREARMS IMPORT/EXPORT ROUNDTABLE TRADE GROUP and TIMOTHY BERO
Defendant:
KENNETH MELSON, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HERNANDEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
HECTOR ERNESTO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LI v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv00504
Plaintiff:
NING LI
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
