Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MACANDREWS & FORBES
as 1:2013cv00926
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MACANDREWS & FORBES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01629
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Amicu: JOHN KLINE , UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , DAN BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ABBOUSHI v. BENTLEY FORBES GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00082
Plaintiff: HIND ABBOUSHI
Defendant: BENTLEY FORBES GROUP, LLC , ABLE JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC. and MISTER KLEEN MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. AARP et al
as 1:2009cv00409
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN WILLIAMS and ANN SMITH
Defendant: AARP, AARP SERVICES INC., ROBERT G. ROMASCO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Love, Rosemary, et al v. Johanns, Michael, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-5449
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Defendant - Terminated Party: Ann M. Veneman
Defendant - Appellee: Michael O. Johanns
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: National Women's Law Center, National Partnership for Women & Families, Impact Fund and others
BOLGER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv00906
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH ANN BOLGER , NICOLE DAVIS , HELEN JOHNSON and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CHARLES H. RAMSEY, ARTHUR BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?