Cases 11 - 20 of 48
ROBERTSON v. JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
as 1:2020cv03168
Defendant:
JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JERRY E. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER et al v. CAPPER SENIOR I, LP et al
as 1:2020mc00012
Plaintiff:
CARL BECKWITH, FRANKLIN BROWN, CAROLYN EAVES-GOFF and others
Defendant:
CAPPER SENIOR I GP, LLC, FOREST CITY CAPPER/CAROLLSBURG, INC., FC CAPPER SENIOR I, LLC and others
RINDAHL v. ROBERTSON et al
as 1:2019cv03322
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNKOWN AGENTS, JACQUELINE ROBERTSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE RINDAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUNT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv01696
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALDERMAN, ADRIANA WAKELING, ISAAC BLUNT and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MDEWAKANTON BAND OF SIOUX IN MINNESOTA et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
Ross Torgerson, Terri Robertson-Torgerson and Mdewakanton Band of Sioux in Minnesota
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT and TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv01469
Petitioner:
EUGENE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANCHEZ-CANETE v. BOQUIN BANEGAS et al
as 1:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
JESUS SANCHEZ-CANETE
Defendant:
MIRIAN Y. BOQUIN BANEGAS, SUANY LISSETH CARDENAS BOQUIN, ANA CASTILLO MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and JOHN DOES 1-21
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
