Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
BALLARD v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BALLARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BALLARD v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
LINDA BALLARD
Defendant:
WMATA and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BALLARD v. DISBROW
as 1:2021cv02288
Petitioner:
JOSEPH A. BALLARD
Respondent:
LISA S. DISBROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BALLARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv02605
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BALLARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00612
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
