Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TERRELL v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, STEPHEN J. EASTERBROOK, FRED TILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEE v. COVINGTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TYSON LEE
Defendant:
COVINGTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATRICK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
TAMBU PATRICK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RONALD MACHEN, TONY COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Covington, et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
as 14-7132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Covington
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alfreda Turnbow
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., as successor to Washington Mutual Bank and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Michael Lee v. Covington Co. Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 14-7033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Tyson Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
Covington County Sheriff's Department and Covington County District Attorney's Office
LEE v. COVINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TYSON LEE
Defendant:
COVINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and COVINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01750
Plaintiff:
LARRY COVINGTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KELLEY et al v. NITELINES USA, INC.
as 1:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
DAVID KELLEY, JR. , DARAL SMITH , PHYLLIS COVINGTON and others
Defendant:
NITELINES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
