Cases 11 - 20 of 41
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv02086
Defendant:
DIAMOND MAGIC BVBA and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01456
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LAMARTINA, INGA CRAREY, DAVID HUERTA and others
Defendant:
SSC BEVERLY HILLS OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, SSC OAKLAND FRUITVALE OPERATING COMPANY, LP D/B/A FRUITVALE HEALTHCARE CENTER, SSC CLINTON TOWNSHIP OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DIAMOND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01083
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
GLADYS M. DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018mc00114
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JUNG v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv00962
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , SHAUNA MORIE SMITH , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MANOOKIAN et al v. MERVIS et al
as 1:2017mc01172
Petitioner:
BRIAN MANOOKIAN , BRIAN CUMMINGS and CUMMINGS MANOOKIAN, PLC
Respondent:
RONALD MERVIS and MERVIS DIAMOND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES PC v. ORIJI
as 1:2017mc00209
Plaintiff:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES PC
Defendant:
UGOCHI ORIJI
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BURKE v. MERVIS DIAMOND IMPORTERS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00565
Defendant:
MERVIS DIAMOND IMPORTERS, INC. and RONALD MERVIS
Plaintiff:
LAUREN BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 1:2015cv01424
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
