Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Anthony Braxton v. Susan Ellis
as 23-7092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan D. Ellis
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BRAXTON v. ELLIS
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
SUSAN D. ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
CHUNG v. HOWARD THEATER RESTORATION, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
ANDR CHUNG
Defendant:
HOWARD THEATER RESTORATION, INC., ROY CHIP ELLIS and HOWARD THEATER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ELLIS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Defendant:
FBOP, EVERTT COTTRELL, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. D.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
ELLIS D. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
D.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT, MAMIE OSOLA THOMAS-SMITH, MONICA LINDSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Yael Botvin, et al v. Heideman, Nudelman & Kalik, P.C., et al
as 22-7171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Yael Botvin, by Russell Ellis, Administrator, Julie Goldberg-Botvin, Tamar Botvin Dagan and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Heideman, Nudelman & Kalik, P.C., Heideman Law Group, P.C., Richard Heideman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
