Cases 11 - 20 of 29
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton, et al
as 16-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Hylton, CDUSM, Proctor, Deputy U.S. Marshal, Anderson, D/S and others
Michael Johnson v. DC, et al
as 15-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Roy Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, John A. Burke, Detective, Metropolitan Police Department and others
ROUDABUSH v. HYLTON et al
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
HYLTON, D. LAWHORNE, STERNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. HYLTON et al
as 1:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
HYLTON, PROCTOR, ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAZA v. WARE et al
as 1:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
EZEKEIL MAZA
Defendant:
NANCY M. WARE , STACIA HYLTON , FLORIANO WHITWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2013cv01631
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHAM v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
RONALD WORTHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., STEPHEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA et al
as 1:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA, LT. JOSIAH, SGT. JESSUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
