Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Travelers Indemnity Company v. University Hall Condominium, et al
as 20-7027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
3Rd Party Defendant:
Chengetayi Sithole, Linowes Blocher, University Hall Condominium Association and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Tilton Bernstein Management, Inc., James Buckley and University Hall Condominium Owners Association
Defendant / Appellant:
Hazel Bland Thomas
CHRISTIE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2019cv01289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN NAGEL, SANDRA OLIVIA BOUSE, WILLIAM CHRISTIAN NEVINS and others
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nestor Ermogenes Quinteros, et al v. Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, et al
as 17-7093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nestor Ermogenes Arroyo Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Dociteo Sandobal Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Digna Aney Corozo Cortez, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DynCorp, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp International, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
Nestor Ermogenes Quinteros, et al v. Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, et al
as 17-7091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nestor Ermogenes Arroyo Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Dociteo Sandobal Quinteros, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child, Digna Aney Corozo Cortez, La Comunidad de Mataje, Providence of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, on behalf of himself, as legal guardian of his minor child and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edgar Balcazar, John Salas Sanchez, Luciano Quevedo Jimenez and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dyncorp Aerospace Operations, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp Techserv LLC, a Delaware corporation, Dyncorp International, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
CERROS MELENDEZ et al v. POY LOUNG DC GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO CERROS MELENDEZ and LUIS EDUARDO DIAZ ARGUETA
Defendant:
POY LOUNG DC GROUP, LLC , GALAE THAI, INC. , POY LOUNG, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DOE et al v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2016mc01195
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, 1 and JANE DOE, 2
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and BENNY SANTIAGO
Movant:
MOSS GROUP
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CUTCHIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEMANNE KENNETH CUTCHIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, CHRISTIAN MUNOZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, et al v. Dyncorp, et al
as 13-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, husband, on behalf of himself, as guardian of his four minor children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rosa Tanguila Andi, wife, on behalf of herself, as guardian of their four minor children, and on behalf of all others simnilarly situated, Ester Inez Andi, on behalf of herself, as legal guardian of her minor child, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dyncorp, Dyncorp Aerospace Technology, Dyncorp Technical Services, LLC and others
TAYLOR et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2010cv00844
Plaintiff:
AMY BATTLE TAYLOR , CORINNE COLLINS , BETH HOLLOWAY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
