Cases 11 - 20 of 20
FLEMING et al v. CHEROKEE NATION et al
as 1:2019cv01397
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, BILL JOHN BAKER, CHEROKEE NATION ELECTION COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA LEONA BROWN FLEMING and HARVEST INSTITUTE FREEDMEN FEDERATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLEMING et al v. THE CHEROKEE NATION et al
as 1:2018cv02041
Defendant:
BILL JOHN BAKER, CHEROKEE NATION ELECTION COMMISSION, TARA MACLEAN SWEENEY and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA L.B. FLEMING, HARVEST INSTITUTE FREEDMEN FEDERATION, LLC and RHONDA LEONA BROWN FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
CHEROKEE NATION vs. NASH, et al
as 1:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
CHEROKEE NATION
Defendant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_claimant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION, JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2 and others
Cross_claimant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
MARILYN VANN , RONALD MOON , DONALD MOON and others
Cross_defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Marilyn Vann, et al v. DOI, et al
as 11-5322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Vann, Ronald Moon, Donald Moon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and Bill John Baker, in his Official Capacity as Acting Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation
Intervenor - Appellee:
Cherokee Nation
CHEROKEE NATION, THE v. NASH et al
as 1:2010cv01169
Plaintiff:
CHEROKEE NATION, THE
Defendant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_claimant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION, THE
Cross_claimant:
RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Cross_defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and KEN SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Vann, Marilyn, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 07-5024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Marilyn Vann, Ronald Moon, Donald Moon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
Cherokee Nation
Aliron Intl Inc v. Cherokee Natn Indust
as 06-7130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aliron International, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Cherokee Nation Industries, Inc.
USA v. Philip Morris USA, et al
as 04-5358
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to American Tobacco Company and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
British American Tobacco Australia Services, Ltd, BATAS
Intervenor - Appellee:
Cherokee Nation, Smithkline Beecham Corp., GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P. and others
Special Master - Appellee:
Richard A. Levie
USA v. British Amer Tobacco, et al
as 04-5207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd.
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to American Tobacco Company and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
British American Tobacco Australia Services, Ltd, BATAS, Cherokee Nation, Smithkline Beecham Corp. and others
Appellee:
Richard A. Levie, Special Master
VANN et al v. NORTON et al
as 1:2003cv01711
Plaintiff:
MARILYN VANN , RONALD MOON , DONALD MOON and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , DIRK KEMPTHORNE and S. JOE CRITTENDEN
Intervenor:
CHEROKEE NATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
