Cases 11 - 20 of 30
FAM v. BANK OF AMERICA NA (USA) et al
as 1:2015cv01943
Plaintiff:
MARK FAM
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA (USA), FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , DANIEL WHITEHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al
as 14-8002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David L. Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Touchstones Pictures, Simon & Schuster/Pocket Books and others
USA v. Michael Whitehead
as 13-3056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Whitehead
Stanley Summer v. Kirk Andrews, et al
as 12-7071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley Lee Summer
Defendant - Appellee:
Kirk Andrews, Nancy Joan Summer, Randall Mercks and others
SUMMER v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2012cv00907
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LEE SUMMER
Defendant:
KIRK ANDREWS, NANCY JOAN SUMMER, RANDALL MERCKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures Corp., et al
as 12-8002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David L. Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Touchstones Pictures, Simon & Schuster/Pocket Books and others
James Lammers Kurtz v. USA, et al
as 11-5289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James D. Lammers Kurtz
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Wisconsin, Sheboygan County and others
WHITEHEAD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION
as 1:2011cv00641
Plaintiff:
JAMES WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMMERS KURTZ v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv01270
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LAMMERS KURTZ
Defendant:
USA, WISCONSIN, SHEBOYGAN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. WHITEHEAD
as 1:2009cv01758
Petitioner:
MELVIN RICHARDSON
Respondent:
J. D. WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
