Cases 21 - 30 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
INKO-TARIAH v. WASHINGTON POST et al
as 1:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST, RALPH NEWMAN and EDWARD III LANDIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Ralph Northam, et al
as 20-7085
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Herring, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia; his assistants, predecessors, successors, agents, and employees, Ralph Northam, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia; his predecessors, successors, agents, and employees, Lynda Burrows, Mailroom Clerk, GCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Pharaoh & Priest for the Commonwealth of Israel et al
O'CONNOR v. S.O.M.E. et al
as 1:2020cv02298
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, CHARLES ALLEN, VINCENT C. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2020cv01689
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RALPH ANTWON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02850
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DUSENBERRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
as 1:2019cv02716
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS and NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. NORTHAM et al
as 1:2019cv02525
Defendant:
LYNDA BURROWS, DOES #1-7, MARK HERRING and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
