Cases 21 - 30 of 33
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2012cv00327
Plaintiff:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER , GRAYSON BARBER , PABLO GARCIA MOLINA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BARBER v. BELL et al
as 1:2011cv01245
Plaintiff:
EDNA M. BARBER
Defendant:
LEROY C. BELL, JR., ROBERT E. PAYNE and JOHN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CAPITOL GREENROOFS, LLC v. HORTON & BARBER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00886
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL GREENROOFS, LLC
Defendant:
HORTON & BARBER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, INFINITY SURETY AGENCY, LLC and HERMAN W. BARBER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, JACK KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FICKEN et al v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
IVAN FICKEN and CIPRIAN IVANOF
Defendant:
OLIVIA GOLDEN, ROSE MONTGOMERY DAVID, EMMANUAL MBADIUGHA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FICKEN v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2009mc00071
Petitioner:
IVAN FICKEN
Respondent:
OLIVIA GOLDEN, ROSE MONTGOMERY DAVID, EMMANUAL MBADIUGHA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
