Cases 21 - 30 of 67
North American Butterfly v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-5052
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, Manuel Padilla, Jr., in his official capacity as Chief Patrol Agent, United States Customs & Border Protection Rio Grande Valley Border Patrol Sector, Carla L. Provost, in her official capacity as Chief, United States Border Patrol and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
North American Butterfly Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02561
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
MCCLINTON v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
as 1:2018cv02317
Defendant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
Plaintiff:
Carla B. McClinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
RICO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01781
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
CARLA RICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABRAMS v. HAYDEN
as 1:2018cv01338
Plaintiff:
ALVIN ABRAMS
Defendant:
CARLA HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2017cv02651
Plaintiff:
NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN , KEVIN M. MCALEENAN , CARLA L. PROVOST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
