Cases 21 - 30 of 284
MALONE v. BUSH et al
as 1:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES M. MALONE
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, SR., GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2010cv01738
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. G. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, RONALD W. REAGAN, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREA v. SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2010cv01442
Plaintiff:
GUY RALPH PEREA, SR.
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy Perea v. Correctional Officer Daub, et al
as 10-5178
Petitioner - Appellant:
Guy Ralph Perea
Respondent - Appellee:
Correctional Officer Daub, Barack Obama, George W. Bush and others
PEREA v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAUB et al
as 1:2010mc00263
Petitioner:
GUY RALPH PEREA, SR.
Respondent:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAUB, BARAK OBAMA, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FENNICK v. BUSH et al
as 1:2010cv00600
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FENNICK
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BOEING and US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KURNAZ et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01135
Petitioner:
MURAT KURNAZ and RABIYE KURNAZ
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, JR. , DONALD RUMSFELD , JAY HOOD and others
Movant:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. BUSH
as 1:2009cv02049
Plaintiff:
EUGENIA JACKSON
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKEEMAN v. BUSH et al
as 1:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
RITA MORRIS MCKEEMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, LEXIS CAR CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Vincent Hyland, Jr. v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-5091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Vincent Hyland, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., John McCain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
