Cases 21 - 30 of 34
United Gov. Security Officers, et al v. Akal Security, Inc., et al
as 10-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Government Security Officers of America International Union, Ann J. Barkley, William J. Burge and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Akal Security, Inc., MVM, Inc., Ares Group Incorporated and others
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH and GILBERT SAMPSON SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPPE L. SMITH
Defendant:
A. FENTY, D. BROWN, UNKNOWN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. and UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Courtney Anthony Bailey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 09-7007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Courtney Anthony Bailey
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Thomas Winkfield, Officer for the D.C. Jail, William J. Smith, Superintendent of the D.C. Jail and others
MYERS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2008cv01793
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MYERS
Defendant:
RODNEY BYRD, IRVING MILLARD, DERON MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv01640
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
THOMAS J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
BAILEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS WINKFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
