Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 275
Voyageur Outward Bound School, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-5138
Plaintiff / Appellant: Voyageur Outward Bound School, Wenonah Canoe, Inc., Sawbill Canoe Outfitters, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bureau of Land Management, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Center for Biological Diversity, 18cv1496, Izaak Walton League of America, 18cv1496, Wilderness Society, 18cv1496 and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Voyageur Outward Bound School, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-5139
Defendant / Appellee: Bureau of Land Management, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Hungry Jack Outfitters, Ely Outfitting Company & Boundary Waters Guide Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wilderness Society, 18cv1496, Center for Biological Diversity, 18cv1496 and Izaak Walton League of America, 18cv1496
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff: MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant: SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA SCIENTIFIC AND NATURAL AREAS and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1076
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Wisconsin, State of California and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Beck v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5042
Defendant / Appellee: Erica H. Macdonald, United States District Attorney, James A. Crowell, IV, Director/Executive Officer/United States Attorney, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Beck, Reverend Doctor, PhD
State of New Jersey, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 21-5016
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New Jersey, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Maryland and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Frederick, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, Al Stewart, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor and others
State of New Jersey, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1033
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of New Jersey, State of Oregon and others
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1026
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: State of New Jersey, State of Illinois, State of North Carolina and others
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1028
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of Wisconsin and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?