Cases 21 - 30 of 96
RUSHING vs. MELTROTROTTER MISSION
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
MELTROTROTTER MISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSHING vs. CITY OF BARLOW
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
CITY OF BARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ascension Borgess Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ascension Borgess Hospital, Ascension Sacred Heart Hospital Pensacola, Ascension SE Wisconsin Hospital-St. Joseph Campus and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rush Copley Memorial Hospital, 20-cv-01957, Rush Oak Park Hospital, Inc., 20-cv-01957 and Rush University Medical Center, 20-cv-01957
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Shaun Rushing v. U.S. Bank
as 21-7115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Bank
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shaun Rushing v. City of Cape Giradeau
as 21-7113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Cape Giradeau
Shaun Rushing v. N.A.A.C.P.
as 21-7114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant / Appellee:
N.A.A.C.P. and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
RUSHING v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS
as 1:2021cv02613
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING, GHETTO HOOD EMBASSY LLC and EXCONGRESSMAN INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. U.S. BANK
as 1:2021cv02135
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
U.S. BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
