Cases 21 - 30 of 991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCOTT v. HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SCOTT
Defendant:
HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SCOTT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and KAMILA HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5014
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5015
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5013
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
