Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5106
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff: BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant: CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United America Financial, Inco v. Patrick Donahoe
as 11-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant: United America Financial, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee: Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service
COLBERT v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00667
Plaintiff: ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILLIAMS v. POTTER et al
as 1:2009cv01170
Plaintiff: TYRONE WILLIAMS
Defendant: JOHN E. POTTER, CAPITAL METRO AREA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and TERRY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Type: Torts - Injury None
James Neuman v. United States Government
as 08-5535
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee: United States Government, United States Department of Justice, Department of Coordination and Review for the Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
IN RE: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2007mc00574
Petitioner: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Respondent: FARZAD DARUI, FARZAD DARUI and FARZAD DARUI
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?