Cases 21 - 24 of 24
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, et al v. Dyncorp, et al
as 13-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, husband, on behalf of himself, as guardian of his four minor children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rosa Tanguila Andi, wife, on behalf of herself, as guardian of their four minor children, and on behalf of all others simnilarly situated, Ester Inez Andi, on behalf of herself, as legal guardian of her minor child, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dyncorp, Dyncorp Aerospace Technology, Dyncorp Technical Services, LLC and others
People's Mojahedin Org of Iran v. DOS
as 09-1059
Petitioner:
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran
Respondent:
United States Department of State and Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her capacity as Secretary of State
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Gary L. Morsch, MD, Bob Filner, Shelia Jackson Lee and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Mike Coffman
ARIAS et al v. DYNCORP et al
as 1:2001cv01908
Plaintiff:
VENANCIO AGUASANTA ARIAS , ROSA TANGUILA ANDI , ESTER INEZ ANDI and others
Defendant:
DYNCORP , DYNCORP AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY , DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Amicu:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH US , EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL and AMAZON ALLIANCE
Movant:
EAGLE AVIATION SERVICES & TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
Shook, Karen, et al v. DC Fincl Respsble
as 97-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karen Shook, Benjamin Bonham, Sandra Butler-Truesdale and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Childs, Rev. and Wilma R. Harvey
Defendant - Appellee:
D.C. Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Missionary Baptist Ministers Conference for Washington D.C. and Vicinity, District of Columbia Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, Coalition for Political and Financial Accountability and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
