Cases 31 - 40 of 4,232
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant:
MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HILL V. BEAIRD
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
LORETTA HILLWARE, LORETTA HILL and LORETTA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
IN RE JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
as 1:2024mc00056
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
Petitioner:
PRESS COALITION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
