Cases 31 - 40 of 60
MITCHELL v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv01539
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS KANE and CHARLES SAMUELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 16-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Respondent - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Karen Ripple, et al
as 16-5097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Ripple, Fed. Probation Ofc., Intake Counsel, D.C. Bar Assn., Supervisor, Fed. Probation Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KUBAN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv00510
Petitioner:
KENNETH KUBAN
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARROCA v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARROCA
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS R. KANE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. KANE et al
as 1:2013cv00879
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS KANE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Rice v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-5078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Rice, also known as Anthony Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
IBN-HAMEED v. MADDREN et al
as 1:2012cv01961
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEIFUDDIN IBN-HAMEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL MADDREN , KENNEY , PATRICIA A. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
