Cases 31 - 40 of 81
RANDALL v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2017mc02762
Petitioner:
CHARLES RANDALL
Respondent:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SCOT v. TRUMP
as 1:2017mc02764
Plaintiff:
RANDAL SCOT
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
TOLLEFSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
WALTER TOLLEFSON , MARY STEINMAN , JESSICA MECKLENBURG and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2017cv00515
Plaintiff:
ALISA T. RANDALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
DURU v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
KAREN MITCHELL, DOJ/OIG/HHS - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ATLANTA GEORGIA, MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
RANDALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
ALISA T. RANDALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON-BATTLE et al v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. ARIZONA, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
SHERRY DENISE JOHNSON-BATTLE and MICHAEL BATTLE
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. ARIZONA, LLC and NICHOLAS RANDALL WEGMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARTRIDGE v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00248
Defendant:
AMERICAN HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC , AMERICAN HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LMT and RANDALL D. ARLETT
Plaintiff:
OWEN PARTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOLOCK et al v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02483
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOLOCK and RANDAL KUCZOR
Defendant:
WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. and WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
