Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
STARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02840
Plaintiff: DAVID STARKS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01840
Plaintiff: DAVID STARKS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. PRICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01519
Plaintiff: ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER , ADVOCATE CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER , ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
EDGE INVESTMENT, LLC v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00621
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DC WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY , UNKNOWN DC WATER CO-CONSPIRATOR NO. 1 and others
Plaintiff: EDGE INVESTMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH STARKE HOSPITAL et al v. COCHRAN
as 1:2017cv00178
Plaintiff: INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH STARKE HOSPITAL and PALESTINE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
NABAYA v. STARK
as 1:2016cv01987
Plaintiff: SHAPAT NABAYA
Defendant: WALLY STARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STARKS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01303
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: EZELL ADINE STARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Ezell Stark
as 16-3037
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Ezell Adine Starks
:
STARK v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00202
Petitioner: BRADLEY CHRISTOPHER STARK
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., RICHARD B. ROPER, JAMES T. JACKS and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?