Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Kenneth Smith v. Clarence Thomas, et al
as 10-5041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Clarence Thomas, Honorable, Antonin Scalia, Honorable, John G. Roberts, Jr., Honorable and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2009cv01926
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
JOHNSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv00977
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKMAN v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GALLO-RODRIGUEZ v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv01890
Plaintiff:
MARCO ANTONIO GALLO-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gene Smith, Sr. v. Supreme Court of the United St, et al
as 08-5171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of the United States, William K. Suter, Clerk, Jeffrey Atkins, Clerk and others
Clyde Clements, Jr. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-5065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde E. Clements, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael B. Mukasey, In his official capacity of U.S. Attorney General, Eric H. Holder, Jr., In his official capacity of U.S. Attorney General and John G. Roberts, In his official capacity of Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
