Cases 31 - 40 of 2,569
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MCGINN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. MCGINN, III
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CALDWELL v. MAYORKAS
as 1:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. CALDWELL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA, et al v. Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., et al
as 23-7171
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Thomas Bailey, Thomas Erik Bailey and Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., Stone Network, Inc., Steven Rose and others
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
Jeffrey Thomas, Jr. v. Crystal Moreland
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Thomas, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Crystal Moreland
USA v. Kenneth Thomas
as 23-3227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kenneth Joseph Owen Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
