Cases 41 - 46 of 46
MEZA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv01580
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MEZA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. COAST GUARD and NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MEZA v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv01412
Petitioner:
ALFREDO MEZA
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US COAST GUARD and NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HELM et al v. CRIST et al
as 1:2008cv01996
Plaintiff:
MCARTHRU HELM, MICHAEL HUTCHISON, WILLIAM EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
CHARLIE CRIST, WALTER MCNEIL, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ACOSTA ORELLANA et al v. CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2008cv01790
Plaintiff:
JORGE WASHINGTON ACOSTA ORELLANA, JORGE ALFREDO ARAGUNDI LA MOTA, JORGE VINCENTE ACOSTA GARRIDO and others
Defendant:
CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL, CROPLIFE ECUADOR, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Oscar Salazar v. DC
as 08-7100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, Adela and Oscar Salazar, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Agueta and Mirna Paz, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, Adrian Fenty, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia and Vernon Hawkins, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services
Interested Party - Appellee:
Health Services for Children with Special Needs, McKesson Health Solutions, LLC and Health Services for Children With Special Needs, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
