Cases 41 - 50 of 84
WILLETT v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2018cv01707
Defendant:
PATRICK P O'CARROLL, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JOHN D WILCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLETT and JEFFREY M. WILLETT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PSYCHAS et al v. DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
ELLEN PSYCHAS and BONDING YEE
Defendant:
DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , MATTHEW MARCOU and JOHN STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCDANIEL v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02790
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Defendant:
R. JONES, BOND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Jones v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 16-7141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prince Jones
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lafayette Dotson, Adonnis Atchinson, Ricky Donaldson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Muriel Bowser, Phil Mendelson, Kennyan Muduffie and others
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01466
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BESARATI et al v. THOREN BOND et al
as 1:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
VAHID BESARATI , ZHILA SHIRKOOL , SARVENAZ BESARATI and others
Defendant:
MICHELE THOREN BOND, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI and ROBERT WALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
PARK v. KERRY et al
as 1:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
CHAE KUN PARK
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY and MICHELLE THOREN BOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
