Cases 41 - 50 of 653
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LU v. CASTILLO et al
as 1:2022cv03683
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JULIO A. CASTILLO, ANNA BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00117
Respondent:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PROCTOR v. CORDERO et al
as 1:2022cv03407
Plaintiff:
GARY WENDALL PROCTOR
Defendant:
LAURA ALICIA CORDERO, MATTHEW JEFFREY HERTZ, RONALD DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
KIRBY v. VOYAGER 888, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Traciey Kirby
Defendant:
Voyager 888, LLC, d/b/a Assets Gentlemen's Club, Jeffrey Schaeffer, Gabrielle Miller and others
Counter Claimant:
VOYAGER 888, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv03158
Petitioner:
Mr. HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Respondent:
Mr. Jeffrey B Clark
IN RE: JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00096
In Re:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
D.C. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY and HAMILTON P. FOX, III
HASHI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
ISAAC HASHI
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFFREY CLARK, MARK MEADOWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
