Cases 41 - 50 of 2,015
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DC LODGE 1 NAVEL DISTRICT et al. v. SIMMS et al.
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police DC Lodge 1 Naval District Washington Labor Committee, PHILLIP GRIFFIN, Jennifer Smith and others
Defendant:
Happy Simms, Sherman Benton, David Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nicole Pileggi v. Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, LLC
as 24-7022
Plaintiff:
Nicole Pileggi, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, LLC
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and CURTIS CRISTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
