Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. SUTER
as 1:2009mc00618
Plaintiff:
LACY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
LEANDER G. DAVIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, LAURA E. KERNS and LYNNE M. ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv01990
Plaintiff:
LEANDER G. DAVIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, LAURA E. KERNS and LYNNE M. ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Evans v. William Suter, et al
as 09-5242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan F. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, As the Clerk of Court, United States Supreme Court, Danny Bickell, Assistant Clerks, Court for the United States Supreme Court and others
JOHNSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv00977
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUEVANO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant:
GAIL JOHNSON, WILLIAM K. SUTER, US SUPREME CHIEF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Michael Lawrence, et al v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael James Lawrence and William Dean Wetmore
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter and Gail Johnson
Gene E. Smith, Sr. v. William K. Suter, et al
as 08-5411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Individual, Jeffrey Atkins, Individual, M. Blalock, Individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
