Cases 41 - 50 of 65
MARLETT v. MARLETT et al
as 1:2011cv01398
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARLETT
Defendant:
KAREN MARLETT, SHELLY EVERETT, FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROVIDENCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER EVERETT et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00903
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER EVERETT , PROVIDENCE SAINT PETER HOSPITAL and SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
VOID-EL v. O'BRIEN et al
as 1:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
BRUCE EVERETT VOID-EL
Defendant:
TERRY O'BRIEN and JOSE SANTANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Donald Jones v. Louisiana State Bar Assoc., et al
as 10-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C. Landry, Ronald H. Newman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Everett Purvis
as 09-3044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Everett M. Purvis, also known as Man-Man
Everett Watson v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Everett Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and United States Congress
JONES v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR ASSOCIATION, MARK C. LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CONSERVATION FORCE et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION FORCE, INUVIALUIT GAME COUNCIL, ARVIAT HUNTERS AND TRAPPERS ORGANIZATION and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, H. DALE HALL and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Everette Hayes, Jr.
as 08-3119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Everette Lee Hayes, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
