Cases 51 - 60 of 107
In re: Bryant Cunningham
as 16-7131
In Re:
In re: Bryant Cunningham
Appellant - Appellant:
Bryant Cunningham
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In RE: BRYANT CUNNINGHAM
as 1:2016mc02100
Appellant:
BRYANT CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
David Smith v. Graham Mullens, et al
as 16-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Smith, And all others similiarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Graham C. Mullens, U.S. Judge, Pat McCrory, N.C. Governor and Billy Bryant, Lee County Sheriff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMITH v. MULLENS et al
as 1:2016cv01021
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant:
GRAHAM C. MULLENS, MIKE EASLEY and BILLY BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Equitas Disability Advocates v. Jonathan Feigenbaum, et al
as 16-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Jonathan Feigenbaum and Daley, Debofsky and Bryant, P.C.
National Railroad Passenger C v. Fraternal Order of Police, et al
as 16-7004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak, also known as Chicago Union Station Company, also known as Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, also known as Penn Station Leasing, LLC, also known as Washington Terminal Company, also kn
Defendant - Appellant:
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 Labor Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
Sarah Bryant
REYNOLDS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv02157
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS
Defendant:
TYLER BRYANT BROWN and EARNEST A. FINNEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Equitas Disability Advocates, v. David Bryant, et al
as 15-7127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Bryant and Frederick Daley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
