Cases 51 - 60 of 1,764
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LEHIERI v. FEDERAL MARSHALS
as 1:2023cv03438
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LEHIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WILLIAM C. SMITH & CO., INC. v. GUZMAN
as 1:2023cv03581
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM C. SMITH & CO., INC. and US SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
JONES v. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
as 1:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
AMOS N. JONES
Defendant:
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZORN v. UNITED STATES HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023cv02894
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW C. ZORN
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
