Cases 51 - 60 of 73
CHURCH et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHURCH, LESLEY CHURCH, ALMA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Monterra MF, LLC, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Monterra MF, LLC, Armando Codina, an individual, James Carr, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Humane Society International v. FWS, et al
as 21-5298
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Humane Society International
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior and Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Safari Club International, National Association For Biomedical Research, Worldwide Primates, Incorporated and others
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-5265
Plaintiff / Appellee:
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, doing business as Magic City Casino and Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation, a Florida Corporation, doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner / Appellant:
Seminole Tribe of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
Monterra MF, LLC, Armando Codina, James Carr and others
Humane Society International v. FWS, et al
as 21-5240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Humane Society International
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior and Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Safari Club International and National Association For Biomedical Research
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Primate Products, Inc. and Worldwide Primates, Incorporated
Humane Society International v. FWS, et al
as 21-5239
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Humane Society International
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior and Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Safari Club International, Worldwide Primates, Incorporated and Primate Products, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
National Association For Biomedical Research
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02660
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL and HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DEBRA HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Madelaine Durand, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Madelaine Durand, Edwin W. Durand, Jr. and Michael Woods
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gem Green Earth Minerals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, in her official capacity, United States Department of the Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals and others
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02317
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, HEALTHY GULF, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
PINCUS HUETER v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02342
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER and TAO
Defendant:
DEBRA ANN HAALAND, AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT, LEMANU PALEPOI SIALEGA MAUGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
