Cases 51 - 60 of 387
PENN v. BUTLER et al
as 1:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
David Penn
Defendant:
Judah Butler, Jerry Clinton, Jeremy Hannie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-5052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLP v. VENABLE et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
JESSICA VENABLE, SCOTT TOMINOVICH, CHRIS FISH and others
American Forest Resource Council, et al v. Tracy Stone-Manning, et al
as 22-5020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Forest Resource Council, Carpenters Industrial Council, Douglas Timber Operators, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tracy Stone-Manning, Director, Bureau of Land Management and Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior
Jenny Bruns, et al v. USAA, et al
as 22-5011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jenny Bruns and Jeremy Bruns
Defendant / Appellee:
USAA, Reuben F. Young, Robert N. Hunter, Jr. and others
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
