Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Speechnow.org v. FEC
as 08-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Speechnow.org, David Keating, Fred M. Young, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center, Campaign Legal Center and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
FRC Action, Alliance for Justice, Mackinac Center for Public Policy and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Richard Briffault
TAYLOR v. SULLIVAN, et al.,
as 1:2007cv01763
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, WENDELL P. GARDNER, JR., ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffrey Barham v. Kenneth Salazar
as 07-5305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeffrey Barham, Mary Canales, William Durham and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, Department of Interior, Michael B. Mukasey, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles H. Ramsey, in his individual and personal capacity only, Cathy L. Lanier, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Chief, in her official capacity, District of Columbia and others
LEACH v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01399
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LEACH
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ELEANOR HOLMES-NORTON and COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NORTON v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2007cv00529
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE JAY NORTON
Defendant:
JEFFREY ATKINS and RUTH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILORENZO v. NORTON et al
as 1:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DILORENZO and CHRISTOPHER DILORENZO
Defendant:
PHILLIP G. NORTON, BRUCE M. BOWEN, STEVEN J. MENCARINI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Felter, Oranna, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 06-5092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oranna Bumgarner Felter, Calvin Hackford, Alvin Richardson Denver and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Neal A. McCaleb, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Ralph Nordwall, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Southwestern, Chester Mills, Superintendent, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Uinta and Ouray Agency and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior
Cobell, Elouise, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 05-5388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Earl Old Person, Thomas Maulson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Interior, Kevin Gover, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior
Mt Royal Joint Vntr, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 05-5379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mount Royal Joint Venture, Pete Woods and Maxine Woods
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior and P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior
Defendant - Appellee:
Sylvia V. Baca, Acting Assistant Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, Tom Fry, Director, Bureau of Land Management and others
Fund for Animals, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 05-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Fund For Animals, Inc., Patrick Hornberger, Wanda Morton and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary, Department of the Interior and Matthew J. Hogan, Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Dale Hall, Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of the Interior
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Ducks Unlimited, Safari Club International Foundation and Safari Club International
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
