Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 95
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL AUTHORITY et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2019cv00132
Plaintiff: PIEDMONT NEWNAN HOSPITAL, INC., PIEDMONT MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL, INC., NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
RUSH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv03045
Plaintiff: FRANCES RUSH
Defendant: PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff: YI TAI SHAO
Defendant: JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02749
Plaintiff: PROMEDICA BIXBY HOSPITAL, PALMETTO HEALTH EASLEY, SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC. et al v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
as 1:2017mc02848
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RUSHING
Defendant: WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02191
Plaintiff: RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01234
Plaintiff: RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WELCH AND RUSHE, INC. v. WASHINGTON GAS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff: WELCH AND RUSHE, INC.
Defendant: WASHINGTON GAS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7130
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5275
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?